Sunday, July 29, 2018

Chantel Eldridge hires registered citizen to help win a judge's seat in Texas and is getting attacked for it

She deserves props for hiring a registered person for her campaign. She probably understands what registrants face because she's been the target of a dubious prosecution against her, which is currently ongoing. It seems any politician willing to give second chances to registered persons faces attacks like this one.

Contentious 331st District race pits longtime judge against attorney
POLITICS By Ryan Autullo and Tony Plohetski - American-Statesman Staff

Posted: 3:16 p.m. Sunday, February 18, 2018

Eldridge said she’ll probably hire a registered sex offender to be her judicial aide.

Crain disposed of the fewest criminal cases in 2017 among the eight criminal court district judges.

The only contested judicial race in Travis County’s criminal district courts has gotten contentious, with challenger Chantal Eldridge saying taxpayers have been underserved by the incumbent while Eldridge faces questions of her own about the registered sex offender she employs in her law firm and intends to bring on as a judicial aide if she wins.

Eldridge, a 53-year-old career defense lawyer who narrowly lost a judicial race in 2016, is running against state District Judge David Crain, who has presided over the felony 331st District Court since 2010 and has been a judge in Travis County for 32 years. He said his experience sets him apart in this race, suggesting “you wouldn’t want a novice to sit and try to conduct a jury trial for a murder case, child sexual assault, bank robbery or something like that.”

On the campaign trail, Eldridge has characterized Crain as inefficient, pointing to statistics from Dec. 8 that show defendants awaiting resolution of their cases in Crain’s court had averaged 129 days in jail — the most of the county’s eight felony courts.

Those numbers are misleading, Crain said, noting that the total days spent in jail fluctuate as cases are resolved and that he’s “always in the middle” among his peers for the number of pending cases in his court and jury trials. The average time a defendant sits in jail is not among the standards included in an analysis the county did last year to assess judicial efficiency. Neither are jury trials; Crain had eight in 2017, tied for fifth among the eight judges in felony courts.

The county does keep an eye on the number of cases a judge disposes. Crain ranked last in 2017.

“I don’t think he’s doing enough for Travis County,” Eldridge said.

Sex offender on staff

Eldridge faces questions related to the criminal history of a staff member.

Shortly after losing to now-state District Judge Brad Urrutia in 2016, Eldridge hired John Gerard Zamarripa, who had volunteered on her campaign, to be her legal assistant. Zamarripa, 53, pleaded guilty in 1990 to sexual assault of a child after an incident with a family member at a South Austin home. According to a March 1988 arrest affidavit, a 14-year-old girl said she was watching TV with Zamarripa when he began began to kiss her and had sex with her.

Zamarripa was 24 at the time. Under the terms of his plea deal, the conviction was dismissed from his record in 2000 after he successfully completed 10 years of probation. He was ordered to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life.

Eldridge said Zamarripa will probably be her court coordinator if she’s elected, “unless there is some legal reason he shouldn’t, or new allegations come up.” He has been involved in the campaign, coordinating the placement of yard signs and handling media requests.

Refusing employment to a past felon would run counter to her faith in criminal justice rehabilitation, Eldridge said. She called Zamarripa a conscientious worker.

“I just don’t think a criminal history — after somebody has successfully completed their punishment — should bar someone from getting a job, or at least being considered,” she said.

Eldridge’s campaign website addresses Zamarripa’s past — “True to her belief in criminal justice reform, Chantal knows that if she were not willing to offer an ex-felon a second chance, an opportunity to show he was rehabilitated, then she would be a hypocrite.”

If Eldridge wins, Zamarripa’s role in her office could be complicated, as a criminal history might impede his access to certain court documents, according to court administrative director Debra Hale. However, nothing stands in the way of Eldridge hiring him, Hale said.

Zamarripa worked on Mike Martinez’s 2014 mayoral campaign, first as a volunteer and then as a paid staff member. Zamarripa disclosed his criminal history to the campaign before taking the paid position, Martinez said.

“We saw no reason to cut ties with him for something that had happened several decades ago that he disclosed to us,” Martinez said. “He continued to serve on the campaign until the campaign ended.”

A sheriff’s report shows Zamarripa has a pending Class C misdemeanor assault by physical contact charge stemming from multiple incidents last fall in Travis County.

Two female clients at the Travis County Correctional Complex at Del Valle made complaints against Zamarripa, with one saying he grabbed her breast while placing business cards into her pocket, the report says. The woman told deputies that Zamarripa also asked inappropriate questions about her sex life and discussed with her a tattoo on her breast that he saw while looking her up on Facebook.

The second woman said Zamarripa asked inappropriate questions about her sexual history and grabbed her hands, the report says. Eldridge said Zamarripa was checking for markings that would indicate whether she had been cutting herself — a past concern with the woman. That assessment was needed to get the woman approved for outpatient services, Eldridge said.

Zamarripa’s attorney, Charlie Baird, called the allegations frivolous.

“We intend to proceed with the case and have a jury trial if necessary, and we expect him to be fully vindicated,” Baird said.

Zamarripa pleaded not guilty and is scheduled for a pretrial hearing March 29 before a justice of the peace. The maximum punishment for a Class C misdemeanor is a $500 fine.

Zamarripa did not return a message for comment.

It came out in her previous campaign that Eldridge has a criminal past of her own, a 1995 charge for obstruction of process in Putnam County, Tenn. A grand jury indicted her on the misdemeanor charge, which is described in the state statute as intentionally obstructing a law enforcement officer from effecting a stop, frisk, halt, arrest or search by using force against the officer. Eldridge denied that there was any physical contact between herself and the officer, who she said made the arrest in retaliation after Eldridge filed a complaint against him for excessive force against her elderly mother, who was injured while being arrested for a loose dog.

The charge against Eldridge was dismissed in January 1996 — 10 months after the incident. Later that year, Eldridge filed a petition to have the charge expunged from her record.

She moved to Austin with her mother in 2003 and began a criminal defense practice.

Bar association favors Crain

Since mid-December, Crain has secured $45,280 in campaign donations to Eldridge’s $4,451. Of endorsements, Crain has 12 and Eldridge three. The local bar weighed in on the race, with 72 percent of participants siding with Crain.

Eldridge was the only woman in 2016 to lose to a man in a Travis County race, when she got 47 percent of the vote against fellow defense lawyer Urrutia.

Championing fresh ideas, she said she’d like to expand the misdemeanor Phoenix Court — which provides alternatives to jail for defendants charged with prostitution — by bringing it to her felony court. She’d also like to discontinue any conditions that require a person charged with a crime to have permanent housing to qualify for a personal bond.

She also wants to take over a docket that caters to defendants with mental health needs — something Crain developed years ago as a County Court-at-Law judge. The docket is currently handled by Magistrate Judge Leon Grizzard.

While Eldridge has questioned Crain’s record, he’s taken shots of his own, saying Eldridge is not known to take cases to trial.

“She will tell you she’s done some, but no judge I know of has ever heard of them or seen them,” he said.

Crain, 65, said he wants another four-year term and will then probably retire.

Early voting in the Democratic primary gets underway Tuesday. Election day is March 6.

This story has been updated with details of John Zamarippa’s most recent criminal charge, based on documents obtained by the Statesman on Feb. 22.

David Crain, 65, has presided over felony criminal cases as the judge of Texas’ 331st DistrictCourt since 2010. He previously was a County Court-at-Law judge for 19 years and a justice of peace for six years. He earned undergraduate law degrees from the University of Texas.
Civic participation: Has been a judge in Travis County for 32 years.

Chantal Eldridge, 53, has defended people charged with criminal offenses for most of her 29 years as a lawyer. She practiced law in California and Tennessee before moving to Austin in 2003. Much of her practice focuses on defendants with mental health needs.

Civic participation: Has volunteered at voter registration events and fundraisers for Democratic groups.

About the job

State district judges preside over felony criminal cases, such as murder, aggravated assault and burglary of a habitation. They serve four-year terms and make $158,000 a year.

Double whammy against the city of Coalinga CA as it failed to invalidate votes from civilly committed registrants

I meant to post this two months ago. Sorry.

May 9, 2018 ·22 Comments

Patients at Coalinga State Hospital scored two victories today — one in court and the other in the state legislature. As a result of the victories, the patients’ past votes as well as future votes in City of Coalinga elections are valid.

Specifically, a Fresno Superior Court judge ruled today against the City of Coalinga which had attempted to invalidate the patients’ votes in November 2017 which contributed to the defeat of a one cent sales tax. In its decision, the Court noted that the patients’ votes were valid because the patients both live in the City as well as registered to vote there.

Also in its decision, the Court disagreed with the City’s argument that patients could not register to vote there because they had been involuntarily committed to the state hospital. Further, the Court disagreed with the City’s argument that patients, if released, will move to a different location. The Court noted that the “Elections Code does not require, as far as residency for voting purposes goes, that the residence be the place from which the voter will never move. Residence can and does change.”

In the state legislature today, the Assembly Committee on Elections and Redistricting, stopped Assembly Bill 2839 (AB 2839) which would have required patients to vote at their last known address before commitment.

Committee Chair Marc Berman criticized the bill as attacking a fundamental right, that is, voting. He said voters shouldn’t be forced to vote where they no longer live.

Vice Chair Matthew Harper noted that the City of Coalinga has benefited from its annexation of the state hospital for more than 10 years and questioned the motives of the City’s decision to challenge election results after the City failed at its attempt to increase the City’s sales tax.
Committee member Ian Calderon, whose district includes a large state hospital, noted that the Coalinga patients would be”directly affected” by a sales tax increase because they purchase food, clothing and electronics at the state hospital.

Committee member Dr.Shirley Weber stated that people should have the right to vote where they choose to vote. She criticized the City for its attempt to gerrymander votes due to the outcome of one election.

In addition to the committee members, a total of 12 people spoke in opposition to the bill. This total includes registrants, family members and representatives of the ACLU, CA Public Defenders Association, Disability Rights California and the Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws.

“Today’s victory is due, in large part, to the efforts of registrants and family members who wrote letters and testified in opposition to a bill that would have disenfranchised hundreds of California voters,” stated Bellucci. “We thank them for their significant contributions.”